Assessing emerging causes of mitral regurgitation: atrial functional mitral regurgitation.

Functional or secondary mitral regurgitation is linked to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. From a mechanical perspective, secondary mitral regurgitation occurs due to an imbalance between the forces that tether the mitral leaflets and those that close them. This results in incomplete coaptation. Most commonly, functional mitral regurgitation, which occurs in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic disease states, is usually caused by dysfunction and changes in the left ventricle. Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is a disease state that has been more recently recognized. It occurs when mitral annular enlargement is associated with left atrial dilatation, preserving left ventricular geometry and function. AFMR is typically seen in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or heart failure who have a conserved ejection fraction. Published reports and ongoing investigations vary in how they define AFMR. This publication examines the pathophysiology of AFMR and highlights the importance of having a common working standard for the definition of AFMR to ensure consistency in the data reported and to drive forward the much needed research into the outcomes and treatment strategies in this area. Several studies have reported that restrictive annuloplasty and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair can reduce mitral regurgitation and improve symptoms. This narrative review will explore the pathophysiology, echocardiographic diagnosis and treatment of AFMR.

Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with mitral annular disjunction using speckle tracking echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality characterized by the systolic detachment of the posterior mitral annulus and the ventricular myocardium. It is usually observed coexistent with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and associated with a mechanical dysfunction despite preserved electrical isolation function of the mitral annulus. This study aimed to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function using speckle tracking echocardiography in MVP patients with MAD. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective, single-center study including 103 patients with MVP and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were performed to assess LV function and MAD presence. RESULTS: MAD (+) MVP (n = 34), MAD (-) MVP (n = 69), and control (n = 40) groups were enrolled in the study. Among the MVP patients, 34 (33%) had MAD. T-negativity in the inferior leads on electrocardiography was more frequent in the MAD (+) group than in the MAD (-) patients (4.3% vs. 20.6%, p = .014). Mitral regurgitation degree, Pickelhaube sign (17.6% vs. 1.4%, p = .005), and late gadolinium enhancement frequency (35.3% vs. 10.6%, p = .002) were significantly higher in MAD (+) patients. MAD (+) patients had significantly impaired global longitudinal strain (-23.1 ±  2.1 vs. -23.5 ± 2.3, p < .001), basal longitudinal strain (BLS) (-19.6 ±  1.5 vs. -20.5 ± 1.9, p < .001), Mid-Ventricular Longitudinal Strain (-22.2 ± 1.7 vs. -23.2 ± 2.2, p < .001) and LA strain (-24.5 ± 3.9 vs. -27.2 ± 3.6, p < .001) when compared to MAD (-) MVP patients, despite similar LV ejection fraction. All these values of MVP patients were also significantly lower than the control group. The mean MAD distance was 7.8 ± 3.2 mm in MAD (+) patients. Patients with two or more symptoms were higher in the MAD (+) group than in the MAD (-) group (4.3% vs. 44.1%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant decrease in longitudinal strain in MVP patients with MAD, indicating myocardial dysfunction. These findings suggest that MAD may contribute to LV dysfunction and highlight the importance of early detection in younger patients. Further research is needed to explore the functional implications and long-term outcomes of MAD.

Interpapillary muscle distance independently predicts recurrent mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: Ischaemic secondary mitral regurgitation (ISMR) after surgery is due to the displacement of papillary muscles resulting from progressive enlargement of the left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Our aim was to prove that if the interpapillary muscle distance (IPMD) is surgically stabilized, an increase in LVEDD will not lead to a recurrence of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with ISMR, who underwent surgical revascularisation and annuloplasty, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo papillary muscle approximation (PMA). At the 5-year follow-up, we assessed the correlation between PMA and echocardiographic improvements, the effect size of PMA on echocardiographic improvements, and a prediction model for recurrent MR using inferential tree analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between PMA and enhancements in both the α and ß angles (Spearman's rho > 0.7, p < 0.01). The α angle represents the angle between the annular plane and either the A2 annular-coaptation line or the P2 annular-coaptation line. The ß angle indicates the angle between the annular plane and either the A2 annular-leaflet tip line or the P2 annular-leaflet tip line. PMA led to substantial improvements in LVEDD, tenting area, α and ß angles, with a large effect size (Hedge's g ≥ 8, 95% CI ORs ≠ 1). The most reliable predictor of recurrent MR grade was the interpapillary distance, as only patients with an interpapillary distance greater than 40 mm developed ≥ 3 + grade MR. For patients with an IPMD of 40 mm or less, the best predictor of recurrent MR grade was LVEDD. Among the patients, only those with LVEDD greater than 62 mm showed moderate (2+) MR, while only those with LVEDD less than or equal to 62 mm had absent to mild (1+) MR. CONCLUSION: Prediction of recurrent ischaemic MR is not independent of progressive LVEDD increase. PMA-based surgical procedure stabilises IPMD.

Prognostic impact of combined non-severe aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Though the concomitant occurrence of non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is highly prevalent, there are limited data to guide clinical decision-making in this condition. Here, we attempt to determine an aortic valve area (AVA) cut-off value associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with combined non-severe AS and MR. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent echocardiography examination between 2010 and 2021 with evidence of combined non-severe AS and MR. We excluded patients with ≥moderate aortic valve regurgitation or mitral stenosis, as well as patients who underwent any aortic or mitral intervention either prior or following our assessment (n=372). RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 2933 patients with non-severe AS, 506 of them with >mild MR. Patients with both pathologies had lower cardiac output and worse diastolic function.Patients with an AVA ≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR had the highest rates of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations (HR 3.1, IQR 2.4-4, p<0.001) or mortality (HR 2, IQR 1.8-2.4, p<0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with combined non-severe AS and MR have a higher rate of HF hospitalisations and mortality. An AVA≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR is associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Mitral Regurgitation Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Reassessing Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Strategies.

Mitral regurgitation complicated by cardiogenic shock creates a unique and devastating risk profile for patients and poses significant difficulties for physicians who lack a comprehensive range of effective management strategies. Supportive measures such as intravenous vasodilators, intra-aortic balloon pumps, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices are often necessary to stabilize patients prior to definitive treatment with surgical mitral valve replacement or trans-catheter edge-to-edge repair. This review evaluates the evidence for the available supportive and definitive management strategies in patients with mitral regurgitation complicated by cardiogenic shock and presents a framework to aid clinicians in navigating the complex clinical decision-making process. Additionally, the authors review emerging transcatheter mitral valve replacement technologies that hold promise for expanding the therapeutic armamentarium and improving patient outcomes.

Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral Valve Regurgitation in the Setting of Concomitant Coronary or Multivalvular Heart Disease: A Focused Review.

Treatment for mixed valve disease has historically been limited, often surgery being the only option. With the recent advancement of transcatheter therapies, percutaneous approaches are quickly becoming viable therapeutic considerations in inoperable or high-risk patients, also offering the option for a staged or same-session treatment. Guidelines are primarily focused on single-valve disease. However, patients often present with multiple pathologies. This review summarizes the data and literature on transcatheter treatment of patients with mitral regurgitation who concomitantly have aortic stenosis or regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pathophysiology, hemodynamics, available therapies as well as order and timing of interventions are discussed.

A deep dive into the percutaneous mitral valve data.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review offers insights into percutaneous mitral valve management, emphasizing pivotal trials that contributed to its evolution. RECENT FINDINGS: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent heart valve disease, with surgical intervention being the gold standard for managing primary MR. However, a notable proportion of patients face ineligibility criteria or are at high surgical risk, particularly in the setting of secondary MR. To fill this gap, transcatheter therapies have emerged as less invasive alternatives. Initially guided by the EVEREST trial criteria, transcatheter leaflet repair techniques have shown impressive technological improvements, addressing nowadays a wide range of anatomical scenarios. Evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of transcatheter leaflet repair is derived from pivotal trials, including EVEREST II, COAPT, MITRA-FR, and CLASP IID, and large multicenter registries including EXPAND, EXPAND G4, and EuroSMR. However, not all patients meet the anatomical and clinical criteria for leaflet repair. For those patients, transcatheter mitral valve replacement may be a minimally invasive option and multiple clinical trials are current underway. SUMMARY: From MitraClip to newer and more innovative technologies, the landscape of percutaneous mitral valve interventions continues to evolve, offering new hopes to patients who may not be ideal candidates for conventional surgery.

Manifestations of Rheumatic Carditis, Regression of Valvular Regurgitation, and Independent Predictors of Mitral Regurgitation Improvement After Rheumatic Carditis in Thai Children.

Background: Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) with carditis can lead to the development of rheumatic heart disease in children and young adults. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the manifestations of rheumatic carditis, clinically significant regression of valvular regurgitation as assessed by echocardiography, and the independent predictors of mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement after rheumatic carditis in Thai children. Method: Children diagnosed with rheumatic carditis during 2005-2020 at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) were retrospectively enrolled. Trivial, and mild regurgitation were grouped as non-clinically significant (NCS) regurgitation. Valvular regression was defined moderate-severe regurgitation improving to NCS regurgitation. Results: Eighty-one patients (mean age: 10 years, range: 8-12 years) were included. At presentation, 59 (72.8%) patients had combined mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR), 20 (24.6%) patients had MR alone, and 2 (2.4%) patients had AR alone. Concerning severity, 28 (34.6%) and 30 (37%) patients presented with severe and moderate MR, respectively. Severe and moderate AR was found in 9 (11.1%) and 16 (19.8%) patients, respectively. At the one-year follow-up, 43.4% of moderate-severe MR, and 41.7% of moderate-severe AR improved to NCS regurgitation. Multivariate analysis revealed high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = 0.01) and severe carditis (p = 0.05) at presentation to be independent predictors of MR improvement. Conclusion: Thai children with rheumatic carditis had a high incidence of valvular regurgitation; however, the valvular damage was improved in most patients. High ESR and severe carditis independently predict MR improvement.

Potential Effects of Mild Atrial Secondary Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Isolated Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with only moderate atrial secondary mitral regurgitation (asMR) frequently develop heart failure (HF). Mechanisms of HF with moderate asMR and the impact of mild asMR remain unclarified. Although mild/moderate primary mitral regurgitation is compensated by left ventricular (LV) dilatation, the LV is not dilated in asMR. We hypothesized that patients with mild asMR without LV dilatation may have impaired hemodynamics and higher risks of subsequent symptomatic HF deterioration. METHODS: Stroke volume, cardiac output, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were measured by echocardiography in 142 patients with isolated atrial fibrillation and 30 healthy controls. The prognosis of patients with isolated atrial fibrillation was followed up. RESULTS: In the 142 patients with isolated atrial fibrillation, asMR was no/trivial in 55, mild in 83, moderate in 4, while none had severe asMR. Compared with controls and patients with no/trivial asMR, LV end-diastolic volume index was not increased and hemodynamic parameters were abnormal in patients with mild asMR (LV end-diastolic volume index, 65±6 versus 58±8 versus 60±8 mL/m²; stroke volume index, 42±4 versus 35±4 versus 29±6 mL/m²; P<0.001 versus other 2 groups; cardiac output index, 2.8±0.4 versus 2.8±0.5 versus 2.3±0.6 L/min per m²; P<0.001; systolic pulmonary artery pressure, 21±3 versus 26±5 versus 37±9 mm Hg; P<0.001). Although the event-free rate of HF symptomatic deterioration or hospitalization in patients with no/trivial asMR during a median 13.9 months follow-up was 86.9% and 100%, the rate in mild asMR was 59.4% and 85.0% (P<0.001 or P=0.032), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of isolated AF and no compensatory LV dilatation, impaired hemodynamics and higher risks of symptomatic HF deterioration were associated with mild asMR, requiring further studies of causalities.

Pericardiectomy and Mechanical Mitro-Aortic Valve Replacement in a Young Patient With Erdheim-Chester Disease.

Erdheim-Chester disease is a rare histiocytosis that primarily affects the skeletal system, but cardiovascular manifestations occur in 75% of cases and are associated with a poor prognosis. Given the small number of cases, the evolution and management of the disease are uncertain. Therefore, it is important to report and share Erdheim-Chester cases. This report presents the case of a young patient with constrictive pericarditis and mitral valve regurgitation resulting from Erdheim-Chester disease.

Extended septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and its impact on mitral valve function.

AIMS: Septal myectomy is the treatment of choice for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Around 30-60% of patients with HOCM have a secondary mitral valve regurgitation due to systolic anterior motion (SAM). We report our experience with extended septal myectomy and its impact on the incidence of concomitant mitral valve procedures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on 84 patients who underwent SM from January 2008 to February 2022. Surgical procedure was performed according to the concept of 'extended myectomy' described by Messmer in 1994. Follow-up outcomes in terms of survival, hospital admissions for heart failure or MV disease, cardiac reoperations, and pacemaker (PMK) implantation were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 61 ±â€Š15 years. Mitral valve surgery was performed in seven cases (8%); particularly only one patient without degenerative mitral valve disease underwent mitral valve surgery, with a plicature of the posterior leaflet. In-hospital mortality was 5%. Mitral valve regurgitation greater than mild was present in four patients (5%) at discharge. Twelve-year survival was 78 ±â€Š22%. Cumulative incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure and rehospitalization for mitral valve disease was 10 ±â€Š4 and 2.5 ±â€Š2.5%, respectively. PMK implantation was 5% at discharge, with a cumulative incidence of 15 ±â€Š7%. Freedom from cardiac reoperations was 100%. CONCLUSION: Septal myectomy for HOCM is associated with good outcomes. Although concomitant surgery on the mitral valve to address SAM and associated regurgitation has been advocated, these procedures were needed in our practice only in patients with intrinsic mitral valve disease. Adequate myectomy addresses the underlying pathophysiology in most patients.

Economic Burden of Inpatient Care for Mitral Regurgitation in Maryland.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular disease in the United States and increases the risk of death and hospitalization. The economic burden of MR in the United States is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed inpatient hospitalization data from the 1 221 173 Maryland residents who had any in-state admissions from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2019. We assessed the total charges for patients without MR and for patients with MR who underwent medical management, transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement, or surgical mitral valve repair or replacement. During the study period, 26 076 inpatients had a diagnosis of MR. Compared with patients without MR, these patients had more comorbidities and higher inpatient mortality. Patients with medically managed MR incurred average total charges of $23 575 per year; MR was associated with $10 559 more in charges per year and an incremental 3.1 more inpatient days per year as compared with patients without MR. Both surgical mitral valve repair or replacement and transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement were associated with higher charges as compared with medical management during the year of intervention ($47 943 for surgical mitral valve repair or replacement and $63 108 for transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement). Annual charges for both groups were significantly lower as compared with medical management in the second and third years postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: MR is associated with higher mortality and inpatient charges. Patients who undergo surgical or transcatheter intervention incur lower charges compared with medically managed MR patients in the years after the procedure.

Feasibility of concomitant exclusion of left atrial appendage during novel transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair.

The AtriClip device enables the safe and reproducible epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage. Transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair using NeoChord DS100 Artificial Chordae Delivery System has matured and become more standardized. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of combining NeoChord repair and left atrial appendage exclusion in a single procedure through the same minithoracotomy in patients with mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation. From 2018 to 2019, seven patients with severe mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with the novel NeoChord DS 1000 system and concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion using the AtriClip Pro II device. Both procedures were performed via left mini-thoracotomy. The AtriClip device was applied after the NeoChord repair was done. All seven patients had less than moderate mitral regurgitation after the NeoChord repair and successful left atrial appendage occlusion. There were no device or procedure-related complications. Clinical follow-up revealed significant symptomatic improvement, and no cardiovascular complications were reported. Transesophageal echocardiography at 6-12 months post-procedure showed stable left atrial appendage occlusion with no residual flow between the left atrium and the left atrial appendage and a stump of less than 5 mm. Beating heart epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage using AtriClip concomitant with transapical mitral valve repair using Neochord DS 1000 system is a feasible and safe treatment option in mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation in patients with limited indications. However, its safety needs to be confirmed in a larger series of patients.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with acute decompensated heart failure due to severe mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) has been established as a therapy for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in stable patients, and it has recently emerged as a reasonable option for acutely ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TEER in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and severe MR that was deemed to play a major role in their deterioration. METHODS: We included 31 patients who underwent emergent TEER for MR ≥ 3+ from 2012 to 2022 at Sheba Medical Center. Outcomes included procedural safety, procedural success, all-cause mortality, heart failure readmission, and functional improvement. Outcomes were evaluated at 3 months and at 1 year. Data were obtained retrospectively by chart review. RESULTS: Implantation of a TEER device was achieved in 97% of patients, and reduction in MR severity of at least two grades and final MR ≤ 2+ at discharge was achieved in 74%. No intra-procedural mortality or life-threatening complications were noted. Mortality at 30 days was 23%. No excess mortality occurred beyond 6 months, with a total mortality of 41%. At 1 year all survivors had MR ≤ 2+, all were free of heart failure hospitalizations, and 88% were at New York Heart Association class ≤ II. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve TEER for patients with ADHF and significant MR is safe, feasible, and achieves substantial reduction in MR severity. Despite high early mortality, procedural success is associated with good long-term clinical outcomes for patients surviving longer than 6 months.

The Pixel Variation Score: An Echocardiographic Index to Assess Temporal Variation of Mitral Regurgitant Flow.

BACKGROUND: In mitral regurgitation (MR), temporal variation of MR flow has been considered an important reason for inaccurate MR grading. Current echocardiographic methods for assessing temporal MR flow variation are complex, and their clinical relevance has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated whether assessing MR flow variation using a dimensionless index with echocardiography is feasible, clinically meaningful, and related to patient outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP, n = 244) and functional MR (FMR, n = 396) underwent comprehensive echocardiography. Mitral regurgitation severity was assessed using an integrated approach advocated by current guidelines. The MR continuous-wave Doppler envelope was divided into 3 segments of equal duration. Each segment's pixel intensity was assessed to calculate the pixel variation score (PVS). RESULTS: The PVS was lower in FMR patients than in MVP patients. Lower PVS was associated with worse MR, larger left atrial and left ventricular dimensions, lower ejection fraction, and higher pulmonary artery pressures. In MVP, PVS was significantly associated with postoperative left ventricular reverse remodeling and was able to reclassify most patients in whom single-frame measures overestimated MR severity. Finally, PVS had incremental prognostic value on top of clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal variation in MR flow can reliably be assessed with echocardiography through analysis of the continuous-wave Doppler signal. A high PVS value may alert the echocardiographer to defer from single-frame MR grading and also suggests that the MR is probably not severe.

Hydralazine combined with conventional therapy improved outcomes in severe systolic dysfunction and mitral regurgitation.

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) accompanied by significant mitral regurgitation (MR) had poor outcome. Several vasodilator trials showed neutral results. We aimed to investigate the effect of early up-titration of hydralazine combined with conventional treatment in acute HF with severe systolic dysfunction and significant MR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was open-labelled, one-to-one ratio randomized designed. Consecutively hospitalized patients with decompensated HF symptoms, LVEF < 35%, and MR more than moderate severity were enrolled after exclusion. All participants with inadequate preload should have intake promotion with/without fluid supply. Patients receiving evidence-based medications (EBMs) as conventional treatment served as the control. Hydralazine + conventional treatment group received up-titration of hydralazine at Days 1-5 of the index admission combined with EBMs and throughout the course of follow-up. The endpoints included cardiovascular (CV) death and HF rehospitalization. Totally, 408 patients were enrolled (203 in conventional treatment and 205 in hydralazine + conventional treatment). The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. The mean dose of hydralazine was 191 mg at index admission and 264 mg at study end in hydralazine + conventional treatment group. Both groups did not significantly differ in prescription rates and dosages of EBMs (all P > 0.05) at study end. Side effects did not differ between the two groups. Finally, 51% (104 out of 203 cases) reached endpoints in conventional group and 34.6% (71 out of 205 cases) in hydralazine + conventional treatment group, which had a significant reduction in CV events (hazard ratio 0.613, 95% confidence interval 0.427-0.877, P < 0.001). In-hospital death during the index admission was significantly higher in conventional group (5.4% vs. 0.5%, respectively; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When administered without inadequate preload, combining early up-titration of hydralazine with EBMs improves outcome in patients with severe systolic dysfunction and significant MR, and it is safe and well tolerated.

Ivabradine could not decrease mitral regurgitation triggered atrial fibrosis and fibrillation compared with carvedilol.

BACKGROUND: Ivabradine, a medical treatment for heart failure (HF), reduces heart rate (HR) and prolongs diastolic perfusion time. It is frequently prescribed to patients with HF who have a suboptimal response or intolerance to beta-blockers. Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) is a valvular heart disease often associated with the development of HF and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies comparing the effects of ivabradine and beta-blockers on MR are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential therapeutic effects of ivabradine and carvedilol on MR using a rat model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a novel echo-guided mini-invasive surgery, MR was created in 12-weeks-old Sprague-Dawley rats. After 2 weeks, the rats were randomized to receive either ivabradine or carvedilol for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at two-week intervals. Following haemodynamic studies, postmortem tissues were analysed. Notably, the MR-induced myocardial dysfunction did not improve considerably after treatment with ivabradine or carvedilol. However, in haemodynamic studies, pharmacological therapies, particularly carvedilol, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation (end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and decreased compliance (end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05). Compared with ivabradine, a shorter duration (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and reduced inducibility (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol and MR vs. MR + Ivabradine; P < 0.05) of AF were observed in MR rats treated with carvedilol. Similarly, reduced cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis were observed in the MR rat model in the treatment groups, especially in those treated with carvedilol (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although both ivabradine and carvedilol, at least in part, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation and decreased compliance, carvedilol had a better effect on reversing MR-induced cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and arrhythmogenesis than ivabradine. When compared with Ivabradine, MR rats treated with carvedilol exhibited a shorter duration and reduced inducibility of AF, thus providing more effective suppression of HCN4. Further investigations are required to validate our findings.

[Régurgitation mitrale sévère due à la sarcoïdose cardiaque : une présentation clinique inhabituelle ; une étude de cas et des recherches antérieures]. / Severe mitral regurgitation due to cardiac sarcoidosis : An unusual clinical presentation ; a case report and review of the literature.

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous inflammatory disease that may involve multiple organ systems, including the heart. Cardiac manifestations are not rare and include atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, congestive heart failure, valvular dysfunction, pericarditis, and sudden death. Although, cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This article describes a case of a patient with a history of pulmonary sarcoidosis who presented with congestive heart failure, on the basis of severe mitral regurgitation secondary to cardiac infiltration and summarizes the published evidence regarding CS and mitral regurgitation.

Interventional management of mitral regurgitation and sleep disordered breathing: "Catching two birds with one stone".

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), mostly constituting of obstructive and central sleep apnea (OSA and CSA, respectively), is highly prevalent in the general population, and even more among patients with cardiovascular disease, heart failure (HF) and valvular heart disease, such as mitral regurgitation (MR). The coexistence of HF, MR and SDB is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary congestion, as a result of MR, can exaggerate and worsen the clinical status and symptoms of SDB, while OSA and CSA, through various mechanisms that impair left ventricular dynamics, can promote left ventricular remodelling, mitral annulus dilatation and consequently MR. Regarding treatment, positive airway pressure devices used to ameliorate symptoms in SDB also seem to result in a reduction of MR severity, MR jet fraction and an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, surgical and transcatheter interventions for MR, and especially transcatheter edge to edge mitral valve repair (TEER), seem to also have a positive effect on SDB, by reducing OSA and CSA-related severity indexes and improving symptom control. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the common pathophysiology between SDB and MR, as well as to discuss the available evidence regarding the effect of SDB treatment on MR and the effect of mitral valve surgery or transcatheter repair on both OSA and CSA.